The Christian-Koinonia Support Group  

Go Back   The Christian-Koinonia Support Group > Blogs

This blog will contain some insight for those who have experienced spiritual abuse and will also hopefully help to educate those who would like to learn about it.
Old

Experiences Can Be Real, But....

Posted December 12th, 2011 at 08:00 AM by Lois
Here is something to consider. If Paul taught in 1 Corinthians 14 that people would think believers were mad if they heard a bunch of speaking in tongues in a service, what would he say about this laughter and being slain business? Speaking in tongues is biblical. What about these other "manifestations?"

Here is where we must go to the Bible and we do not see these things in the Bible. Neither is taught in the Bible, nor do we see evidence of either in the stories found in the Bible. This should be very telling.

What is accomplished when people laugh out of control, especially during the preaching of the Word? It certainly is not edifying. In addition, Paul taught that the spirit of the prophet is subject to the prophet. This means that as believers, we are in control of what we do and allow.

The passages used to support laughter and being slain are taken out of context and never, ever show anything remotely similar to what goes on in churches that teach and support these things. But because they happen in a church setting, many blindly accept it as being from God. In addition, some in ministry threaten people who would speak against such "moves." (For example, think Hinn and Hanegraaff.)

Experiences can be real, but real experiences don't necessarily translate as being something God ordained.
Administrator
Comments 0 Lois is offline
Old

Signs, Signs, Everywhere A Sign....

Posted December 11th, 2011 at 07:58 AM by Lois
"Signs, signs, everywhere a sign...." Remember this old song? I took the liberty of adding an s. In some churches it is all about signs. Seeking signs. Desiring signs. Disappointed if there are no signs. It's not a good service if there are no signs. What is the next sign going to be?

This mindset is not good. Jesus and the apostles warn us against desiring and following after signs. Yet despite these warnings, what do we see in some churches? People flocking after the next big sign.

You can hear the circus barker, "Step right up, folks! See the spectacular! The unbelievable! Watch jewels suddenly appear before your eyes! Gold dust fills the air! People fall at the wave of a hand! Come on in and marvel at the sight!"

Gold. It came in the form of dust, fillings and entire teeth. Angel feathers. Jewels. Laughter. Falling out. Oil. Spiritual drunkenness. Slain. The list goes on as people line up and get carried away by the wind.

People are drawn to the spectacular. We want to see amazing things. Why would the people in Jesus' days be reprimanded for seeking signs? This is why we have so many problems in the churches which focus on emotionalism. We want gold fillings. Then gold dust. Then we want to see pulpits broken in half or people shaking uncontrollably in and out of services. There's always a search for more and more. Bigger and better.

Who is getting all the attention? Does the focus come on a person or people, the pastor, the church? If God is going to do something miraculous, HE would be getting the glory and the attention, with the result of people turning to Him. In the New Testament, miracles happened to confirm the Gospel being preached and the apostles didn't run after or focus on them.

Oftentimes things like these help fill up someone's wallet, be that the pastor's, evangelist's or the church fund. The love of money causes many to do things which they ought not do.

What happens at the places where these things occur? Is all the talk and emphasis now on the "move"? Do they lose a focus of preaching the Gospel? How is their teaching being distorted by these signs? Does the emphasis become that of experiences trumping Scripture? (It has to be true or of God because it happened in church and look how many are at the church! Because it makes me excited and I feel good! I know that isn't in the Bible, but God can do anything, can't He?) The dismissal of Scripture is a serious thing in these "moves." Experience is placed above Scripture and the Bible gets interpreted through the experiences and not the other way around.

What's the fruit of it all? Why would God perform such acts? What does gold teeth or gold dust mean to Him? Does He really focus on these material things? Would he really leave jewels laying around at a church? Really? Where do we
...
Administrator
Comments 1 Lois is offline
Old

Faith Without Works Is Dead

Posted December 10th, 2011 at 07:04 AM by Lois
Faith without works is dead. That is true. But does this Bible passage mean what unhealthy churches say it does, in equating works with their list of things a Christian must do to be saved?

We are saved because of what Jesus did for us by dying in our place. If works could have saved people, then the law that God put into place for the Jews would have accomplished this. The Bible is very vocal in that it did not.

Works, as mentioned in the book of James, are our actions. Faith without works is dead- not because works are essential to our salvation- but because if one has faith in God it will be evidenced by their actions. You can't have real faith with nothing to show for it. However, in those actions, there is no salvation made, kept or bought. They are simply a natural result of our faith in God.

Back in the early church, people wanted to add rules to be saved. This thought is nothing new. People seem to have a hard time accepting by faith that Jesus paid the price completely for their salvation. He said it was finished. People keep wanting to add conditions to our salvation. So let's look at the early church....

The second chapter of Galatians continues with Paul telling about his past. This is where he starts to show the Galatians the problem that false brothers caused with their false teachings.

Chapter 15 of Acts tells in more detail about what Paul shares happened in Jerusalem. I encourage you to take the time to read Acts 15. The men who came to Antioch from Judea, who were teaching that the Gentiles must be circumcised in order to be saved, had caused a sharp division. This division caused the believers to send a delegation of people, including Paul & Barnabas, to Jerusalem in order to consult with the apostles and other elders.

At the meeting, some proclaimed that the Gentiles must be circumcised and made to obey the law of Moses. There is lots of discussion and then Peter addresses them all, reminding them that God made no distinction between the Jews and Gentiles and purified the Gentile's hearts by faith. He then asks why they are trying to test God by making the Gentiles do what even the Jews could not follow? He states that they are saved through the grace of God.

James later shares similar thoughts and they decide to write a letter to the believers in Antioch, Syria & Cilicia that states they will not burden the Gentiles with anything more than four requirements. These are listed in verse 29 of Acts 15.

So things haven't changed and adding lists of things to do in order to be saved is hundreds upon hundreds of years old. The problem now is that Christianity has split itself into so many different groups that there is now no longer one place for people to go in order to sort out what isn't proper teaching. We can't send a delegation to Jerusalem to consult with the
...
Administrator
Comments 0 Lois is offline
Old

Drunk In Church?!

Posted December 9th, 2011 at 05:52 AM by Lois
You may have seen people in church, acting like they were drunk. Perhaps even the minister said something like, "We all need to get drunk in the Spirit!" Is this thought biblical? What passage is used to justify such behavior?

This is a good area for us to examine because there is a teaching out there that because some onlookers referred to those on the day of Pentecost as being drunk in Acts 2, that it must mean they were exhibiting drunken behavior such as we see allowed in some churches today. I believe this is far, far from the truth.

Since the Bible warns us against drunkenness, why would God cause in us a behavior which would make us appear to be exactly what he tells us we should not be? Stop and think about it. It makes no sense. The Bible warns us to abstain from the appearance of evil in 1 Thessalonians 5:22. In Galatians 5, we see a list of some of the acts of a sinful nature and drunkenness is listed. Furthermore, we see no biblical instances which show the type of behavior which is today termed being drunk in the Spirit.

Let's look at Acts 2. Verse two shows us that they were sitting when the Holy Spirit came upon them. So what attracted others to go and see what was happening? Verse five says it was because the crowd heard the believers speaking in their own languages. If you were in a different country and heard someone speaking your language instead of that of the country you were visiting, it would likewise get your attention. It doesn't mention anyone was slurring their speech or stumbling around or acting incoherant, laughing like people often do when they are drunk or passed out on the floor. What attracted them was the sound they heard as they were hearing their native languages being spoken. This is made very clear in the passage.

This stirred conversation. They knew the believers shouldn't be speaking in their languages. They questioned why and what it meant. This is when some mocked and proclaimed they had too much to drink. That remark was in reference to the speaking in tongues that they heard and not any drunken type behavior. Nowhere in Acts does it show believers as exhibiting any evidence of possible drunkenness.

Haven't we ever heard someone give a lame reason for something which they observed but couldn't understand? How would being drunk cause someone to be able to speak a foreign language they did not know? In no way does this passage give any indication that the believers were acting in a drunken manner as some teach today. This is when Peter and the other apostles stood up while Peter proclaimed Jesus to them and let them know that drunkenness had nothing to do with what was happening.

This teaching is one which really bothers me. The Bible is very clear about the issue of drunkenness and being careful when drinking and that those who follow Christ should not drink excessively
...
Administrator
Comments 0 Lois is offline
Old

Things To Keep In Mind While Sorting Through The Teachings

Posted December 8th, 2011 at 06:51 AM by Lois
For those still trying to sort through the doctrines you were taught in an unhealthy church, here are some things to think about when looking into an issue in the Bible:

Keep the passage in its context. One can often make it appear to seem like a passage is teaching something different when it is taken out of context or partially quoted. You need to read the surrounding verses, and sometimes chapters, and not just the proof-text given.

Beware of assigning a word an incorrect definition. Many in unhealthy churches assign word meanings to words which do not reflect their true biblical meaning. If one doesn't look further into this, they can then be led to believe the Bible teaches something totally different than it does. Some words that readily come to mind from my old church organization are long, peculiar, shamefacedness and hallelujah (the latter probably only pertains to my former church). Nowadays it is very easy to look up the basics of the original Greek or Hebrew words used in the Bible. Your modern day dictionary is not what you will want to use.

Look at the overall picture. Discover what the "whole," or all, of the Bible teaches on a subject and not just a few passages. Unhealthy churches piece together passages to come up with some teachings. Yet if you study what the entire Bible says on the subject, you will find what they say really isn't taught in Scripture. You won't find the doctrine being stated by the apostles or Jesus and you won't find any examples of them doing so. Complete concordances are found in abundance to help you find every instance of a word in the Bible.

Interpret a difficult passage in light of those that are clearly understood. When one passage seems to not fit in with the rest of Scripture on a subject, we need to interpret that passage in light of what is clear. God's Word isn't going to contradict itself. For instance, if there is one verse that on the surface could appear to say something is salvational, and yet that is never explicitly said anywhere in the Bible, then you are probably understanding it incorrectly. It needs to be interpreted by the passages that are clearly understood.

Set aside preconceived ideas and take care to not read things into a text that are not stated. When we read the Bible, we should approach it in a way that God can speak to us through His Word. That's hard to do if we are dead set in our minds that we know it all and that our interpretation must be 100% accurate. This is what causes many in Pentecostal churches, when they read in the Bible about the Holy Spirit, to automatically think "speaking in tongues" even if it is not in the text. Thus we read into Scripture our thoughts or what we have heard taught in church and we aren't going to learn that way. Don't set about to prove what you believe is correct or to prove a doctrine to be false. Instead,
...
Administrator
Posted in Questioning
Comments 4 Lois is offline

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2003-2012 Lois E. Gibson